ARENDT@OUTREAU

'Eichmann n'a pas agi par «stupidité mais par absence de pensée », le "mal par omission" qui détruit chez les juges la faculté de distinguer ce qui est bien et ce qui est mal...

To the chief-Editor of "New-Yorker"

Dear sir,
Everybody in France is glaring at "l'Affaire d'Outreau", the criminal result of "liberated justice". Montesquieu proposed "separation of powers". France separated the juges from their minister! Poverty of comments by "medias", stale words like "autism", proposal to adopt the Anglo-Saxon inquiry system while Great Britain thinks of adopting the French "procureur"...
What is missing? A Hannah Arendt. I propose to profit by this opportunity to show the merits and limits of this thinker, as well as the strange mission given to her by her "makers", not yet solved.
Today the correct question is: "Is France a country of no-rights?". Anybody can be hunted like a stinking dog. Remember Abbé Pierre for a hiccup of liberty of opinion. Only one person opposed this indignity, and I was this one, describing the use of "pissing doggies" by "religions" during the last five millennia).
To explain my "unbelievable crossing of th 20th Century", just imagine Wittgenstein interested in solving enterprises affairs. In fact I tried "anything he did, I can do". To his "tables of decided decisions" I oppose my "M.I.S.", checked by DATAMATION and BIT, (35 years ago). To his sister's palace, I opposed a factory in Africa, I built totally alone. I was surely a better teacher but I've nothing versus his jet engine. Strangely did not see the impact of the computer on our way of thinking. I therefore entered WORLD TRADE in 1956, (50 years ago!) To solve "Turing's Puzzle", correctly re-defined,
"The computer will never think but it will oblige us to use our brain differently..."
More than did the appearance of writing or paper. More ?